Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human-centered computing (NASA)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 22:53, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Human-centered computing (NASA)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very little information; notability unclear; no refs; orphaned. MaxVeers (talk) 00:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Rapid keep. No brainer. Goog on "Human-Centered Computing" nasa throws up good secondary sources in the hundreds. Clearly notable and important. Halfmast (talk) 17:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep It would seem that sources abound. The fact that an article is currently a stub isn't grounds for deletion. That fact that the article lacks references and is orphaned is a case for cleanup, not deletion.   I'd gently suggest that the nom review the deletion policy.  B figura  (talk) 00:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Many things NASA does are in fact notable. This does not seem to be an exception.  --Firefly322 (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Why the nom did not check carefully if there are really references available or not. I smell disruption with this kind of irresponsible nomination.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 20:05, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plenty of references are available. Below are some good references:
 * Review of NASA's Aerospace Technology Enterprise, 2003, ISBN 0309090806
 * Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion by David L. Hall and James Llinas, 2001, ISBN 0849323797


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.