Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human Rights Award of Korea


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Human Rights Award of Korea

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No third-party reliable sources to indicate how this award meets WP:GNG notability. One of several walled-garden-ish articles created by a blocked sockpuppet apparently part of an attempt to promote a recipient of this award. OhNo itsJamie Talk 04:14, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Daily NK is the third-party source. It is also awarded by South Korean government. What needs to be more notable than that in order to recognize the notablity? -- Shyoon1 (talk) 22:02, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete TheDailyNK printed an article on it because of the person that won it that year was working on North Korean human rights. Not because the award itself is independently significant. I feel it's not because there are only 3 sources for this award that has been going on for 9 years, 2 of them referring to the same year one of them about Peter Park, who is currently suspected of making a vanity page for himself. (If he has I can see how he won all these non notable awards, he puts in a lot of effort.)  But Even if he hasn't, I can dig up 9 sources for my local 4H clubs annual blue ribbon winners for the past 9 years, I feel a national award that is supposedly notable should be able to do that much. Peachywink (talk) 04:17, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep 149 articles with the award's Korean name 대한민국인권상 appearing in the title at Naver News search . 58.176.246.42 (talk) 14:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Per Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions, that doesn't mean much of anything. OhNo itsJamie Talk 17:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * 149 articles from newspapers where the name of the topic appears in the title is a prima facie indication of significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:GOOGLEHITS warns against the use of raw web search result counts and specifically mentions news search engines as a helpful alternative. 58.176.246.42 (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree above.--Altostratus (talk) 03:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   14:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S warm   ♠  04:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems to be compelling evidence that there are more than sufficient Korean language sources for 대한민국인권 상 to merit a GNG pass. For what it is worth, Ko-WP has an article on the award with a lengthy list of recipients which include activists, academics, and NGOs. Carrite (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.