Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human overpopulation: Wildlife Will Pay the Price


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Obvious SNOW delete per WP:NOT and WP:OR. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Human overpopulation: Wildlife Will Pay the Price

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This seems to be like a personal essay JDOG555 (talk) 03:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC) Op


 * Delete - per nom. → Σ  τ  c . 03:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, unencyclopedic essay, nothing worth merging anywhere. -- Kinu  t/c 03:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nominator has it right, clearly WP:OR. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:08, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely WP:OR. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:20, 3 December 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete. Clearly not encyclopeadic in nature, and does not have NPOV Millermk90 (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I am in agreement with every statement above, after careful consideration.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  05:02, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as original essay. Will the closing administrator please add a note to the (new) content creator's page briefly explaining the decision and the process of userfication in the hopes that they will take another swing at contributing to WP. Incremental improvements of existing articles rather than huge original essays is the way to go, newcomers... Carrite (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I originally proposed deletion via PROD as a personal essay. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 07:50, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; I think the prod tag could have been kept on this article and nobody would have had any issues with deleting it, but I guess it's better to open it up for discussion here. There's pretty clear consensus that this article is basically a personal essay and unencyclopedic by nature.  Master&amp;  Expert ( Talk ) 13:14, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the PROD would have been fine for this one. However, since we're here, it is an WP:ESSAY, it is pure POV and should not be in the encyclopedia. FWIW, see Overpopulation, Carrying capacity, and World population. Seems the bases are pretty well covered already. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as a personal essay. J I P  &#124; Talk 16:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as personal essay. Personally I wouldn't have even proded, but speedy deleted per G1. Patent Nonsense. Perhaps that's just me being bold. - Rushyo  Talk  17:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete per every single comment above. Joefridayquaker (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:OR.  Snowolf How can I help? 21:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.