Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanaura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete - article blanked by creator. ... disco spinster   talk  02:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Humanaura

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Let us be gentle and just call this original research. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete- I would have prodded this. It's an unsourced, unverifiable poorly written cross-breed between original research and complete bollocks. Reyk  YO!  07:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see now that you did prod this in the first place. Reyk  YO!  09:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per g1 and a1. Failing that delete per nom and Reyk. Prod was removed without reason. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-07t09:01z
 * As above, this appars to be OR, and certainly doesn't seem to be in any way neutral. However it could be a credible search term  so a redirect to Aura (paranormal) seems sensible.Nigel Ish (talk) 09:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as nonsense. Edward321 (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.