Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanism and Star Trek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Punkmorten 22:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Humanism and Star Trek
Article was created as an essay through original research and does not provide a neutral point of view. If not deleted, it should be moved to wikisource. Targetter 20:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Make it so! -- Chet nc contribstalk 21:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia is not a place for original research. -Fsotrain09 21:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as original research. Unless this has been published somewhere, it doesn't belong in wikisource, either.--Chaser T 21:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as Original Research Emc²  ( CONTACT ME ) 22:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, I dinna care. HumbleGod 23:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who defines humanism best of all? The answer: Dr. “Bones” McCoy, and Mr. Spock! Now back to Enlightenment age Europe..." You have much to answer for, Mr Roddenberry. --DaveG12345 04:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.