Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanistic naturalism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

Humanistic naturalism
The result of the debate was Keep. Hipocrite - &laquo; Talk &raquo; 00:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Neology Ezeu 00:13, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep A complex google search for "Humanistic naturalism" -wikipedia philosophy gives 256 quality results. Not a lot but seems notable enough in the field of Philosophy. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia 00:33 2006-02-02
 * Keep. Used by notable figures such as John Dewey and William Carlos Williams. Apparently. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  00:43, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 01:58, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Achille. Royboycrashfan 05:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per squiddy. Akerensky99 05:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge as a veriation of Humanism? (Signed: J.Smith) 05:57, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, do not merge. Important philosophical concept. Savidan 07:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Achille and Squiddy. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 11:19, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep In cases like these google should not be used as an indication for the importance of the subject. Important school of thought. Do not merge -- † Ðy§ep§ion † 19:05, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Achille Nick Catalano (Talk) 19:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, can probably expand to clarify what sets these writers apart, otherwise merge with naturalism (philosophy). I rewrote the intro slightly to help. &#8592;Hob 21:46, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, encyclopedic and plenty of room to expand. -- A l e x W C ov i n g t o n  (talk) 23:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.