Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humanity's End


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (nomination withdrawn). The nominator withdrew their nomination. Furthermore, no other !votes (other than the nomination) to delete were posted, and the keep !vote demonstrates the topic's notability per WP:NF. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 06:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Humanity's End

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable film with minimal to no coverage. Does not meet criteria at WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 17:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to article on producer/director. This review might help. Still not enough to say about film for its own article. Borock (talk) 00:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Portugal:
 * France:
 * Japan:


 * Keep I have not (yet) begun work to expand and source the article (later tonight) but find immediately found in-depth commentary and analysis in secondary sources DVD Talk Home Media Magazine Virtual DVD Magazine (German) and Quiet Earth... and to a far lesser extent, those in Horror Talk Close-up Film 411 Mania Blogomatic3000 Flickering Myth as indicators that we have a meeting of the requisistes of WP:NRVE and WP:NF. While yes, its state when nominated is/was poor, and with respects to the nominator, the addressable issues of expansion and sourcing do not require deletion. We have plenty with which to build the nominated stub into something which better serves the project. Back in a while...  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think those sources are substantial enough to establish notability here, although they do make me want to see it. :-) -Borock (talk) 05:20, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note that expansion and improvement is ongoing, and the sources being used DO address the film directly and in detail, and in a more-than-trivial manner. Even without extensive media coverage (this ain't Star Wars after all), the ones used (so far) are substantial enough in their analysis and commentary so as to have this topic meet WP:NF. As I wrote above, addresable issues rarely require deletion of stub articles... specially if the topic can be expanded and made encyclopedic to serve the project.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 23:59, 22 June 2012 (UTC)


 * I would like to withdraw this AfD. It seems that Michael's good work has revealed enough notability for inclusion. BOVINEBOY 2008 01:38, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.