Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humayun Kabir Sadhu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  19:34, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Humayun Kabir Sadhu

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * 1) Subject is not regarded as an important figure or is not widely cited by peers or successors.
 * 2) Subject is not known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique.
 * 3) Subject has not created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work.
 * 4) Subject's works have not: (a) become a significant monument, (b) not been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) not won significant critical attention, or (d) not been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Anyone?

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 05:44, 3 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment: The nominator makes no claim to have carried out a search for sources, but there are quite a few—especially under Sadhu's Bengali name, হুমায়ূন সাধু. He also has a considerably longer article on Bengali Wikipedia, with 19 sources. This feels like a case where notability would be clear were it not for the language barrier. --Usernameunique (talk) 07:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep- Per this source and wide spread coverage and tributes in all major media publications.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 16:54, 7 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.