Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humbierto


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was: Speedily deleted as an article lacking any context, and as likely hoax/vandalism. - Mike Rosoft 20:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Humbierto
Prod-ed, deProd-ed, reProd-ed, deleted, re-created, now listed here. This is an unverified fictional character of uncertain context. Delete unless verified. GTBacchus(talk) 07:04, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. This character doesn't seem to exist.  Unless there is some sort of verfication that it exists, it should be deleted and should not be recreated. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:15, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I wish we could Keep it. Humbierto sounds like humble, and therefore is naturally a humble character.   Axiomm 11:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. I don't feel that is a valid reason to keep it. Unless this character actually exists (either in real life or fiction) and is verifiabile, it doesn't belong on an encyclopedia. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 11:32, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted hoax. Recreation = speedy. Weregerbil 11:47, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I would have speedied it, but the first deletion was improper because the prod had been removed. Recreation of improperly deleted content isn't speediable. -GTBacchus(talk) 14:42, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, no. Not a recreation speedy, even if it were a proper Prod.  According to Proposed deletion, they may be recreated or undeleted at will. -GTBacchus(talk) 16:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Even though Wikipedia is able to be edited by anyone, there are topics which are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. This is one of them. NickelShoe 00:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'm sorry... what? FictionCruft.  D e izio  01:32, 10 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.