Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humour in Coronation Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Humour in Coronation Street

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is made up of WP:FANCRUFT and fails WP:GNG. DarkGlow (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:25, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:35, 26 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Barely updated, WP:FANCRUFT material. eeveeman (talk) 22:07, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:48, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. While I did find some coverage on the "Northern humour" used on the show, like this Manchester Evening News article and this book, there does not appear to be enough significant amount of coverage or critical commentary to support a separate article. I would imagine that any information on the show's humor could be kept in the main Coronation Street article. It is an interesting idea for an article, and I'd be curious if it would work for a different show, but that is an entirely separate conversation. Aoba47 (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per all the above.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 08:53, 27 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.