Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humphrey Scott Xavier


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:54, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Humphrey Scott Xavier

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

Someone clearly spent a long time writing this (most likely autobiographical) article. However, it seems to describe an entirely unremarkable person using terrible POV language. To be honest I think it's a CSD case but will give the author the benefit of the doubt by having it debated here. Biker Biker (talk) 09:57, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * NOTE - the original editor also created a bit-for-bit identical copy at Humprhrey Scott Xavier, which for now I have blanked and redirected to the original article. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:52, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, unremarkable biography. Unsubstantiated assertions of notability + questionable references. - Reconsider !  10:07, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

*Delete on the basis that the author has created a section titled 'publications and masterpieces'. Also i checked out the "Order of Diplomacy General Secretariat Inc" which apparently has 70,000 members worldwide etc- and it just seemed like rubbish. I dont have the time to check all the claims made in this article and to check on the validity of all the organisations mentioned, but if anyone can show me evidence that this isnt all rubbish i'll gladly change my vote. --Brunk500 (talk) 12:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Wow, just...wow. Except for #1 which is the website of a 501(c)(3) nonprofit out of Tennessee, all the references are either his personal website, Wikipedia, or wikipilipinas.org ("the hip 'n free Phillipine encyclopedia"). Google brings up the above sites, plus Facebook.  Gnews and Gscholar, to my surprise, bring up nothing.  His publications and masterpieces are not in Worldcat or any of the major academic journals, so far as I can tell (I admit, I didn't search for all of them).  I feel like there must be something I'm missing, but based on what I've found so far I guess I'm forced to recommend delete: NN. Some jerk on the Internet (talk) 14:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. And I'll add my own wow. PDCook (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and previous comments. I must admit to some surprise that he does not claim to be competent at full contact origami, or have outlaw status in Peru.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 03:43, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW anyone? PDCook (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree. Deletion decision seems unanimous, so can someone go ahead and do the dirty deed? --Biker Biker (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.