Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Humpty Jackson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. article improved - strong policy driven consensus to keep (non-admin closure) Off2riorob (talk) 13:54, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Humpty Jackson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

= Falls into the WP:Notability crime section (A person who is notable only for being the victim of or committing a crime or crimes should not normally be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article) Cox wasan (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. That guideline is really referring to WP:ONEEVENT. It's not intended to block all articles about criminals. Jackson was a notorious gang leader who was known for his many crimes over an extended period of time. Pburka (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * keep &mdash; again, i don't see how you're reading the notability guideline. there is not a single crime that made this person notable.  he was involved in many ongoing crimes, as attested to by numerous reliable sources, cited in the actual article.  herbert asbury, the encyclopedia of crime, and the montreal gazette aren't enough for you? &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 18:05, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - Refer to this and read the articles. Well documented historical events satisfy WP:CRIME, perpetrators section, #2 - "The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally, historic significance is indicated by sustained coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources which persists beyond contemporaneous news coverage and devotes significant attention to the individual's role." Northamerica1000 (talk) 04:53, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep, numerous sources establish the subject's notability. --Nuujinn (talk) 11:25, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.