Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Quoc Nguyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested; see WP:SOFTDELETE. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Hung Quoc Nguyen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP, written far too much like a bullet-pointed résumé and not nearly enough like an encyclopedia article, of a person notable primarily for serving on committees and running but not winning as a political candidate. This is, further, based predominantly on primary sources rather than reliable ones -- and the relatively few sources that are genuinely reliable ones are not substantively about him, but generally just include him giving soundbite in an article about something else. As always, that is not the kind of sourcing that gets a person over WP:GNG if he doesn't have an automatic pass of any SNG; he needs to be substantively the subject of media coverage, not just namechecked within coverage of other things, to clear the GNG bar. Also probable conflict of interest, as the article was created by User:Hnguyen140. Bearcat (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:17, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable person with a basically resume article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.