Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian Electrographic Art Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  03:51, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Hungarian Electrographic Art Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No independent sources: Publications by the organization about itself, but no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Fails WP:NORG Vexations (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:47, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no secondary sources for notability. oncamera   (talk page)  16:17, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't delete! There are enough different independent sources about HEAA and independent opinions by art critics in puplications. There are no Fails WP:NORG ! Click on links once more and read attantively: 1.  2020 FILM AWARDS Best Experimental Short: FLOATING WORLD – LIFE 1.0, Dénes Ruzsa and Fruzsina Spitzer, Hungary. 2. EXHIBITIONS 2020  3rd prize (Marcil Lavallée Prize) to O. Golub, Ukraine, for Keys. This is the necessary information for the article. It explains who are members of the association. --Paintgol (talk) 19:33, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Immediate delete Many self-published reference issues, and many links leading to nowhere. Severe storm  28  01:32, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 13:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep the HEAA page. It contains information  about almost  100 artists - a unique phenomenon in the field of contemporary media art. Now everyone can open links and read their articles, look to numerous art works.   Deleting the page will deprive Wikipedia readers of their right to freedom of information. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_information . Thanks. --Vizobraz (talk) 12:14, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * — Vizobraz (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Vexations (talk) 13:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not finding the kind of independent, in-depth sourcing online one would expect for a notable cultural organization, nor does the current article sourcing meet WP:NORG or WP:GNG. It is not enough that the org exists. There are tens of thousands of such orgs, what needs to be displayed is why THIS org is notable enough that others would write about it in independent art historical books or academic journal articles. Possibly a COI or promo effort? Netherzone (talk) 10:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete - I likewise cannot find independent, in-depth coverage that I'd expect a notable arts organisation to get, and cannot therefore see that it meets the GNG. firefly  ( t · c ) 17:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.