Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian discrimination against Roma people


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Roma minority of Hungary. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:09, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Hungarian discrimination against Roma people

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is a POV fork of Roma minority of Hungary. The article is pure WP:SYNTH, as it uses flawed logic to attribute Roma social issues to discrimination from non-Romas. I believe this article should be deleted (the contents are all duplicated in the main article) and the section from the main article retitled and cleaned up to be in compliance with policy. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 14:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge Into Roma minority of Hungary Computerjoe 's talk 16:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge per above, looks sourced. brandt 23:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I compared this article with Roma minority of Hungary. Every single reference from this article is already in the other one, and I believe all the text is there too (barring small differences in wording). So there is really nothing to merge. It seems to me that 'Hungarian discrimination against Roma people' is a POV title, and if the title is kept, even as a redirect, it would need to be reworded somehow. If we go ahead and delete the 'discrimination' article then the problem goes away and we don't have to solve it. EdJohnston (talk) 02:58, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge back - a separate (mostly redundent) article is not needed, unless a lot more cites can be found. Bearian (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.