Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Nepal relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Hungary–Nepal relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

another random combination. non resident embassies. Google news search doesn't show up much in terms of bilateral relations. LibStar (talk) 04:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep pending the result of the discussion at Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations, which is directly related to the issue of notability, see Wikipedia_talk:Notability. Nomination for deletion is pre-mature and could preempt and poison the discussion which may see the development of alternate criteria for notability. The nominator has ignored requests not to continue nominating these articles for deletion until the centralized discussion on notability has been resolved. Martintg (talk) 05:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * the above cannot be considered a vote for keep, it does not assess the notability of relations. LibStar (talk) 05:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Centralized discussions are not arbitration, or even mediation. There is no definite outcome of a centralized discussion, and even if there was, the underlying issue is and will always be one of notability. There is no apparently notability listed here. If someone can add it, then it should stay, and if we delete it now, and someone discovers it later, then it should stay later. Shadowjams (talk) 05:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for failure to assert notability through reliable sources. - Biruitorul Talk 06:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete random combination. WP:FREAKY and WP:N.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Koshoes (talk • contribs) 15:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:38, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- Russavia Dialogue 09:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:N - we should be adding these to WP:FREAKY Nick-D (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and no need to wait on the second reading of the minutes on that "centralized discussion". Even the article concedes that there is no ongoing relationship between the two nations.  WP:N is good enough for me, thank you.  Mandsford (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep for now, centralized discussion has started (Centralized discussion/Bilateral international relations), it makes sense to see and wait if that leads to usable outcome for this class of articles in general. --Reinoutr (talk) 09:48, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure nonsense article, and the centralized discussion is not in itself a reason. Dahn (talk) 13:54, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete "Both countries far from each other". Indeed. No indication that WP:N is, or ever will be, satisfied. No need at all for this article per WP:Summary style. Note to closing admin: The two "keep" votes are clearly invalid since the centralised discussion is clearly not going to finish with a result any time soon, and it's already obvious that there would be no consensus for a subject-specific notability guideline that would modify, rather than interpret, the general notability criteria. Any such guideline would be based on deletion discussions such as this one. --Hans Adler (talk) 07:28, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.