Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungary–Qatar relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 14:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Hungary–Qatar relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is another randomised selection and fails WP:N A bloke called AndrewConvosMy Messies 19:04, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:FREAKY, and zero evidence of notability. - Biruitorul Talk 07:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Gosh, I'm going to strongly protest mentioning this boring title on the wonderful list of "deleted articles with freaky titles". West Bosniak-Qatar relations might belong there. Mandsford (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Why is this listed under "Fiction and Arts"? Whether notable or not, I wouldn't think Hungary-Qatar relations are fictional. Rlendog (talk) 16:34, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the usual reasons. JJL (talk) 04:18, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note to closing admin, editor has the exact same comments in 3 other AfDs. Ikip (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable, not likely to be found so. This article borders on being a mere dictionary entry. -- Blue Squadron  Raven  17:04, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Closing administrator please note this editor has copy and pasted the exact same delete reason on Over forty other AfDs today. Two weeks ago editor copy and pasted the same reason in 15 AfDs in less than 3 minutes. Ikip (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete no reliable sources that discuss a subject (no sources in the article as it currently stands) and no relaible sources finadle by me that are in fact  reliable? delete.Bali ultimate (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete These articles seem like a freshman computer project in creating all combinations of 203 things taken 2 at a time. That does not sound like a sensible way to create an encyclopedia. Where are the "multiple reliable and independent sources with significant coverage" needed to satisfy WP:N? Seems more like fodder for a directory, which Wikipedia is not. Edison (talk) 05:40, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notable relations. I note this AfD is listed as Fiction and Arts! ha LibStar (talk) 04:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No notable content, no notability assertable. But heck, can you imagine when we get the "trilateral relations" pages?   "Argentina - Australia- Monaco relations"? Collect (talk) 18:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.