Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunger Pains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sources aren't amazing but I'd say there's enough for it to pass GNG (just!) (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Hunger Pains

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NALBUMS. "Articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to into the artist's article or discography." Flat Out (talk) 23:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the group. Nothing here really but a tracklisting. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep now has access to 3 reviews, passes WP:NALBUMS.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC) It could be expanded to start class.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Minimal coverage from Triple J - doesn't really review the album, more just stating that it exists. Is urbansmarts.com a reliable source? --Michig (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Added two more reviews from mainstream newspapers. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep sufficient independent reliable sources to establish notability in its own right. Dan arndt (talk) 13:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.