Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunt Followers

Hunt Followers
Non-encyclopedic. Another POV diatribe against Fox hunters. See above. Jayjg 20:52, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * It is rather strange that in another conf, where your racism has been exposed, you had a bit of a paddy and now you've decide to go around marking up some of contributions for deletion. Is this just an other thing you do when stamping your feet doesn't get you anywhere. Seems abit personal, but atleast it's an improvment and is slighly more honest and up front than you normal attempts to introduce bias. Keep trying perhaps one day something honest will be said by you deliberatly and with knowledge of the facts.--Jirate 21:07, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Is that a vote for or against deletion? Jayjg 21:15, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Neologism/POV. All this can be merged with Fox Hunting, which could stand to be NPOV'ed as well.
 * Delete. Dictdef padded with absurd POV ("if fox hunting is banned, they are likely to head up a terrorist campaign").   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 21:29, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-encyclopedic. Personal research.  Nonsense.  ---Rednblu 22:11, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fox hunting - living in the British countryside I have come across this term, it's not as much of a neologism as one might think. No content to merge, just redirect. -- Graham  &#9786; | Talk 22:17, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think I've seen the term in a sense of nonparticipating spectators at a hunt.  If that actually occurs, it could be mentioned in Fox hunting, and Hunt followers (lower-case "f") might be set up as a redirect to Fox hunting.  This stub, however, might as well be deleted. JamesMLane 22:23, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * The title isn't formatted well enough to use as a redirect. Delete. Fire Star 22:43, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: POV news item and advocacy. Geogre 00:28, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Too POV at the moment, but a valid subject. It's not a neologism at all - it's a term that's been around for as long as there have been hunts. -- Necrothesp 00:40, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, and irrelevant. Information could be easily incorporated into Fox hunting. Binadot 02:23, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Move to hunt followers, then merge & redirect to fox hunting. Wile E. Heresiarch 03:28, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete no redirect. Duplicate article. --Improv 04:18, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * I honestly cannot believe this. This is a real term. Redirect it - not a candidate for deletion. Mark Richards 19:31, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Both with and without caps, should be a redirect to fox hunting and the topic should be taken up there. In some areas, hunt followers outnumber actual hunters, and it is certainly not a neologism. -- Jmabel 21:28, Sep 24, 2004 (UTC)