Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Candelaria


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Hunter Candelaria

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Apparent autobiography of a student filmmaker with no sign of having WP:NOTABILITY under any of the applicable guidelines. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: If more sources are found, and I mean reliable sources are found, then Ill vote keep. Dr et  h  00:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence found to indicate subject meets WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE at this time.  Gong   show  03:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-remarkable person that seems to fail all relevant sections of WP:BIO. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 07:30, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE. Despite the tone of the article, the "films" are really just YouTube kid stuff.  Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete creators of fan films and the like are generally not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.