Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Carson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure) Mkdw talk 00:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Hunter Carson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

TucsonDavid U . S . A . 03:20, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. No basis is stated for the nomination.  In any event, Hunter Carson was a highly notable child actor for a couple of years: his performance in Paris, Texas was widely acclaimed, as described in  "A 9-Year-Old Handful Named Hunter Carson Scores a Stunning Acting Debut in Paris, Texas", People, March 25, 1985.  He followed that up with another well-publicized starring role in Invaders from Mars (see, for example, the syndicated LA Daily News article "Mother, Son Work Happily Together In Invaders From Mars").  His career since then has not been at the same level, but he passes both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR#1.  --Arxiloxos (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia:Speedy keep as nominator "fails to advance an argument for deletion", or keep on its merits. As well as major roles in the 2 films mentioned (suggesting WP:NACTOR), he got press coverage including that cited and one in Houston Chronicle which discusses his filmmaking and his relationship to his father (WP:GNG). He also has his feature film directorial debut out this summer, which isn't yet in itself grounds for notability, but may be if it's a success. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as the nom has given zero rationale as to why they think this article should be deleted. Regular keep due to the sources found by Colapeninsula and Arxiloxos about demonstrating satisfying WP:BIO. --Oakshade (talk) 06:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:10, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. No rationale. Clearly notable per sources found above. Mcewan (talk) 16:51, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found and offered and per WP:NTEMP or Speedy Keep per merits and lack of deletion rationale.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 18:01, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets our notability criteria.Epeefleche (talk) 18:39, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.