Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunter Hancock (YouTuber)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Hunter Hancock (YouTuber)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This Youtuber does not meet WP criteria for WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR or WP:NARTIST. The article sourcing consists of blogs, user-submitted content or non-independent content. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Visual arts,  and Technology. Netherzone (talk) 03:05, 8 July 2022 (UTC)


 * bruh GrayNG (talk) 03:45, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete unless somebody can provide evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources, which I have been unable to find. Cullen328 (talk) 05:57, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The Torrent-Freak article about the legal DMCA tussle he was involved with and the others given in the article are just enough for GNG I think. This also, this [ https://reclaimthenet.org/meatcanyon-bugs-bunny-wabbit-season-copyright-claim/], and another Torrent Freak about the result of the lawsuit [ https://torrentfreak.com/youtube-refuses-to-process-dmca-counternotice-for-creepy-bugs-cartoon-200328/]. Oaktree b (talk) 17:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Those aren't sources, they are three blogs. Netherzone (talk) 03:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Agree sourcing is problematic, notability is absent. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.