Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hunters in the Snow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 18:03, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Hunters in the Snow

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Article is full of original research and lacking citations (for 3 years). Article is a stub, but the potential of the article has not been shown to be sufficient. ~ QuasiAbstract {talk/contrib} 18:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sh i r ik  ( Questions or Comments? ) 00:15, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, but excise all the OR (a high-schooler's book report?) and keep as a true stub. The Los Angeles Times writes, "Wolff is one of our most anthologized short story writers; his seminal 'Hunters in the Snow,' 'Mortals' and 'Bullet in the Brain' show up, perennially, in college textbooks and syllabuses."   A GBooks search seems to bear that out.  This is, of course, yet another article (like 99% of articles on TV episodes) where the OR from a reader/viewer should be extirpated; but unlike most individual TV episodes, this story itself appears to be encyclopedically notable.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 19:32, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep on the same basis as Glenfarcias. Short stories are a bit of a problem--there might be some merit in combining the discussion of them in to one long article, but they do meet our requirements of having adequate sourcing to stand alone.    DGG ( talk ) 05:30, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.