Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huorn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ent. Tone 11:41, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Huorn

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication this fictional race passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG. Pure WP:PLOT. BEFORE fails to show anything that's not a mention in passing/fictional bio summary. Possible redirect target is Ent. Prod removed by User:Necrothesp with "significant race in Tolkien's work". Seriously? Ents might be argued to be significant. Who heard of Huorns? Even most Tolkien fans would draw blanks... it's just a name for pre-Ents. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  10:40, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep or Merge to Ent. Would most Tolkien fans draw blanks? They obviously don't know his works very well then! -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Ent. Relatively minor fictional creatures without much, if anything, in the way of coverage in reliable, secondary sources.  They're already covered in the main article on Ents, so a simple redirect there should suffice.  Rorshacma (talk) 16:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ent The most prominent aspect of the Hurons is that they are related to the Ents. They are rarely discussed in any other context. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 19:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ent — I have read The Lord of the Rings many times and I draw a blank on Huorn.--Jack Upland (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * well, you need to reread The Two Towers ... a little more carefully Coolabahapple (talk) 08:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment, i am shocked at the apparent lack of wikieditor knowledge about the association of huorns with the history of fantasy miniature wargaming/figures, in 1972 Miniature Figurines Ltd, at the time, one of the largest figures manufacturers (for time period, size range, and actual numbers made) (another shock for coola that this company doesn't have a wikiarticle!), brought out a range of 25mm figures called "Mythical Earth" complete range here, and deemed huorns important enough to include a large and small huorn (also, here is a mention (p. 681) about the range from Airfix Magazine). "Yes coola, very interesting, but does it contribute to huorn wikinotability?", probably not, but thought editors may like to know:)) Coolabahapple (talk) 10:06, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I am tired of the radical inclusionist attacking those of us who do not agree with their attempts to turn Wikipedia into the LoTR wikia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails NFICTION/GNG. Pure PLOT. Necrothesp does not advance a valid AfD argument. Kacper IV (talk) 09:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Selective Merge to Ent. Only covered briefly in the Ent article, and I think a short paragraph should be transferred over to form a subsection. Hog Farm (talk) 18:04, 28 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.