Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane Katrina books


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted per CSD g12; no content besides copyrighted material. &mdash; madman bum and angel 03:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Hurricane Katrina books

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article reads like it was copied from the back of the book. It's unencyclopedic and sounds suspiciously like an advertisement. Most of the text is quotes from reviews. Fails NPOV. Nikkimaria 23:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete; definitely advertisement, and I wouldn't be surprised if it was a copyvio of the blurb. &mdash; Coren (talk) 23:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I've tagged it for copyvio. The introduction appears to be taken from a brief review found on a blog, and the large excerpts from reviews go way beyond what can be justified as fair use. Thomjakobsen 02:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.