Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurry Up, We're Dreaming


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Hurry Up, We're Dreaming

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD with the following rationale:
 * soon to be released albums get articles on wikipedia all the time.

Unreleased album by M83 obviously does not qualify for WP:NALBUMS. A single from the album has apparently been released, but unreleased albums that aren't covered in-depth by secondary sources don't belong on WP per similar reasoning at WP:TOOSOON. I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 03:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Yunshui (talk) 07:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —Michaela den (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete this unreferenced article unless someone can produce evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  19:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Found decent coverage by some reliable sources. —Yk Yk Yk  talk ~ contrib 06:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. We got significant coverage from Stereogum, Pitchfork and Spin. So yeah, I would say this article has evidence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 19:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2011 (UTC)


 * So far, the consensus seems to be 3 keep, 1 delete (I'm not sure what side I, Jethrobot falls on). However, I think this deletion debate should end because "title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label," and therefore, the album can have an independent article. By the way, in response to I, Jethrobot, here is a link to the first single from the album, via Rolling Stone. Thomsonmg2000 (talk) 04:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Enough information for an article. Close enough to release to make deletion pointless.--Michig (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. As noted above, we have an album title, release date and tracklisting. The non-trivial coverage [at Pitchfork, Spin, Under the Radar, Stereogum] added by User:Thomsonmg2000 demonstrates the subject meets WP:NALBUM.  Gongshow  Talk 20:19, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Both User:Thomsonmg2000 and User:Gongshow are right, this meets the criteria on multiple levels, as stated. Nothingcorporate (talk) 20:47, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.