Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussain Chandio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  11:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Hussain Chandio

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

promo The Banner talk 18:10, 12 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:23, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The subject is notable. All of the references cited in the article (except one that of wordpress) are reliable sources and I have checked them, Chandio easily passes WP:GNG. Since the nominator's concern is 'promo', the appropriate action would be to remove material that promotes the subject in any manner.  sami  talk 22:13, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. does not meet the criteria for CREATIVE. No works in permanent collections of major museums. No substantial criticism of his work.  DGG ( talk ) 19:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as noticing this is close to closing, I'll comment and I'll note the Keep vote of WP:GNG is not as convincing as actual policy, and with that, we can remove it especially since there are in fact no museum collections, and that itself establishes significance hence notability; it's not the case here, since there's also no equivalent of major art reviews, hence delete. SwisterTwister   talk  19:36, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep- The subject may not be passing on WP:CREATIVE. But somehow he is passing on WP:GNG. References are from Dawn (newspaper) and The Express Tribune, I guess they are reputable news agencies in Pakistan. has valid points.  Hitro   talk  20:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG is not the same thing as applicable notability in WP:CREATIVE, exactly how WP:GNG is not applicable if WP:NOT is of essential use, therefore because he's not notable as an artist, there's no substance in the career he's best known for, or in this case, not notable for. SwisterTwister   talk  21:15, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * @ Is he failing on WP:GNG. Are those references not reliable or substantial? Please do not manipulate the guidelines. Lets go through basics. Hitro   talk  21:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment- @ I don't know why no body has pointed out yet but it's the silliest rationale for deletion I have ever came across. "Promo"... "Promo" is G11...If it's not G11 then place advert tag... why are we discussing deletion??? ...... Don't you think you should give some proper rationale while nominating... I don't think people who take part in deletion discussions have to create reasons for deletion as they are doing here Hitro   talk  20:43, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I am a nice guy. Unfortunately, your rant makes your own arguments silly. No personal attacks please. The Banner talk 20:50, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * You are a nice guy and I mean it but how did I attack you personally? I am talking about your rationale that you placed while nominating. You nominated this, so going against your nomination is a "personal attack"?  Hitro   talk  21:00, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Your keep vote is indeed no personal attack. It is your rant that is a personal attack. Like {...) but it's the silliest rationale for deletion I have ever came across.. That is not a content-related argument whatsoever, just attacking the nominator. The Banner talk 21:04, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually I pinged nominator that is you... so I was pointing towards you, i was commenting, not ranting. But I was not attacking, I just didn't like the way the article was nominated for deletion... I always try to support discussions about non-English speaking world as per WP:WORLDVIEW, most of the times articles are deleted even though they have non-english reliable references but nobody pointed them out.. Hitro   talk  21:33, 3 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.