Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussain Muradi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deletion Metamagician3000 (talk) 12:30, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hussain Muradi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Poorly sourced BLP--the one link provided is dead. There's one article in the Independent, and another with pretty much the same content from Radio Free Europe, there's nothing besides blogs and such. This is one case where a weakly sourced BLP of an only moderately notable person does no one any good: delete, please. Drmies (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I could have specified more: it's a good example of a WP:BLP1E. Drmies (talk) 04:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  04:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  04:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have a lot of sympathy with causes like this, but this is a clear WP:SOAPBOX. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:19, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The two provided sources are reliable and really independent. Perhaps needs more references.Rirunmot (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC).
 * The YouTube ref has been removed by the owner. So that's no longer valid.  And the other is an interview, that's a primary source.  Woogee (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only is this a bit of WP:SOAPBOX, this barely qualifies as an article.  Wikipedia will be substantially improved with the removal of this page.  JBsupreme (talk) 21:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

The outcome is speedy deletion: notability ... but also important BLP issues after contact was made indirectly by the subject of the article. Metamagician3000 (talk) 23:07, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.