Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussain Saqafi Chullikkod


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:35, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Hussain Saqafi Chullikkod

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMICS. Zero results in Google News for his last name (well, technically a Youtube video popped up, I suppose). Article currently sourced to a brief mention of his name, two articles that don't even mention him, and three Youtube videos. Created by a now-blocked sock (not blocked/banned when this was created, so not CSD eligible). ~ RobTalk 06:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Uanfala (talk) 10:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Might qualify for WP:Prof, but institution does not seem to be a major one. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:47, 4 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 6 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Vice-chancellor of a university with 20,000 students. I think that makes it notable enough. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * University claims to have 20,000 students, but is it notable? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Number of students is a fairly terrible indicator of how noteworthy the school is. The University of Phoenix has 162,000 students, but it's an awful institution. Meanwhile, Dartmouth College has only 6,000, but it's an Ivy. ~ RobTalk 01:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Universities are normally notable per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Uanfala (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * The point is not whether the university is notable. The point is whether the university is notable enough for WP:Prof to hold and requires it to have a substantial scholarly impact. That is not yet proven here. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:54, 11 June 2016 (UTC).
 * Yes, please note that I said "noteworthy", not notable. By noteworthy, I mean so highly esteemed that the holding of a top position at the university alone implies that the subject would meet WP:GNG if one looked hard enough for sources. That's what WP:PROF is about. For instance, I would consider top administrators at Harvard University or the University of California, Berkeley to be automatically notable based on their positions. But schools like Binghamton University (my alma mater) or Syracuse University wouldn't fit the bill. They're not top universities (as much as Binghamton likes to pretend it is). ~ RobTalk 23:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.