Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussein Ammar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Hussein Ammar

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Since WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, GNG must be met. This doesn't come close. Was draftified for improvement, but returned without any improvement.  Onel 5969  TT me 11:08, 27 March 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Noting 's "keep" !vote on the article's talk page. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:55, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 19:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - Per A1lfcIRQ. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - Win Win is the best source I can find, which is just an image caption. I note that the two keep !voters haven't provided any evidence to support their claim of notability. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:03, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP, Fails GNG and BIO. BEFORE showed promos, database records, nothing that meets SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Above Keep provides no sources. WP:BLP states "Be very firm about the use of high-quality sources"'; BLPs need IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notability to avoid abuse per well known core policy (WP:V and WP:BLP) and guidelines (WP:BIO and WP:IS, WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV).  // Timothy :: talk  19:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.