Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hussein Shuqul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 08:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Hussein Shuqul

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Notability, verifiability. No independent, third-party sources via Gweb, Gnews, Gbooks under either name given that provide anything more than a passing mention of the individual (wikimirrors excluded) can't verify the position claimed. I've gone AfD rather than PROD to get more eyes on it because foreign-language bios are always tricky with respect to transliteration, etc. --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  19:13, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. EnabledDanger (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: this 2010 source appears to have a chapter on the subject: . Unfortunately I don't have access to the source, so it is not really a solution. Apologies. AustralianRupert (talk) 04:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Mirrors_and_forks/Abc leads me to think that that source is a likely wikimirror. --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  07:11, 11 September 2010 (UTC)  PS:  No apologies, I always consider these sourcing expeditions like puzzles, always happy to follow up a new thread.  --  j &#9883; e decker  talk  07:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you might be correct in saying it is a wikimirror. In which case, it would not be considered a reliable source. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of reliable sources allowing any of this to be verified. There are things in the article that if they could be sourced would likely be enough for notability, but notability is not enough by itself, we also need verifiability. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Are there any Somali-reading editors who could evaluate these potential sources? Phil Bridger (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.