Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huthaifa al-Batawi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Not an obvious consensus, but the keeps present a stronger case than the merge opinions. Owen&times; &#9742;  21:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Huthaifa al-Batawi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable, as the sources just indicate death. Intoronto1125 Talk  Contributions  17:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP1E. The sources warrant an article for the event, but not for the people involved. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 18:40, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge. The event could have an article with information on al-Batawi included. Raphie (talk) 18:43, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Known for more than one event. See, for example, Militant leader among 12 caught in connection with Iraq church siege from November 2010. WWGB (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge with Islamic State of Iraq. Sources indicate no notability of his own other from being leader of that organization. PluniAlmoni (talk) 10:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per WWGB. WP:BLP1E does not apply. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 18:15, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The article indicates strong significance, just because the event is detailed does not mean his life is that one event and thus the article. Zenithfel (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep figure of   importance in major historic events, which will be part of the historical record--in. BLP obviously does not apply, and wouldn't even if he were still alive. The suggested merge is so drastic as to amount to deletion.    DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.