Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hvnnibvl


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  12:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Hvnnibvl

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is nothing more than vanity spam. Other than a few shout outs by a popular EDM magazine, there is virtually no meaningful coverage. Searching gives little else and sources like this are anything but reliable. The "releases" on EDM network are not true releases as anyone can write in and have them "release" tehm there. Further, there are no reliable sources reporting is UMG partnership. Sites like EDM sauce, for example require artists to pay to publish their songs, so it's not organic coverage. Cultr doesn't strike me as particularly reliable as there's no insight into their editorial process and the writer of said article doesn't appear to be a member of staff, if they have any. CUPIDICAE💕 17:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:08, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I only find the EDM sources as above, nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 01:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * I've read the above comments and would like to address some things. The UMG partnership can be verified by a read of the comments on the Enter Records homepage which states its' partnership with UMG; this is the label where this artist released the article's referenced UMG release "Wake Up". The EDM Network releases are verifiable as well, as The EDM Network owns Indie Select, previously titled Artist Intelligence Agency, which is where the article's referenced EDM Network releases "Lose" and "No Cover" were released; further, articles on EDM.com / The EDM Network cannot be published by "anyone" as they do have dedicated staff and contributors - for example. The Cultr and EDM Sauce articles can certainly be removed, though I would like to point out that EDM Sauce does not "require" artists to pay for published content on their site - the fact that payment is an option does make the EDM Sauce reference here questionable. This source can also be removed, as it does not mention this artist's contribution to that work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.144.17.177 (talk) 13:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Comment if we remove EDM as above, I found zero sources. non-notable. Oaktree b (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.