Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hwebul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:56, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Hwebul

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Dictionary definition, violates WP:DICDEF. Randykitty (talk) 16:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 16:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not only is it a dictionary definition, but it isn't even an English term, or a term used in English. And this is the English Wikipedia. The topic of "Buddhist statue destruction" may be notable but I am not seeing coverage on it. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:04, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment There are sources about this phenomenon, e.g. . And the article title is not a deletion issue, that's why we have WP:RM. On the other hand, the article needs to be rewritten from scratch anyway to address WP:SPS and WP:SYN, so absent a complete rewrite WP:TNT seems appropriate. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 02:04, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. per WP:DICDEF and not  a word in English.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 11:31, 11 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.