Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hybrid (2007 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Juliette Han (talk) 10:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Hybrid (2007 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article about a made-for-TV movie has no sources beyond links to IMDB and the production company's website, and the movie does not meet any of the criteria of WP:NFILM. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep — Seems to be notable enough. There are source available online including: The Werewolf Filmography: 300+ Movies Indie Horrors! The Not-To-Be-Missed, The Acceptable, and The Forgettable Encyclopedia of Television Film Directors Hybrid (DVD).  CAPTAIN MEDUSA   talk  18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The Encyclopedia of Television Film Directors only lists the movie as one of the director's films, which is just a passing mention. Horror.com is a fansite. So I don't think either of those contributes anything to notability. The first two might. --RL0919 (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep I believe that CAPTAIN MEDUSA sources make it pass GNG.★Trekker (talk) 14:04, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:14, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NEXIST and WP:ARTN: The two published books quoted above (The Werewolf Filmography and Indie Horrors!) show coverage in reliable sources. I added those links in a Further reading section so that editors who want to improve the article can use them as sources. I also deleted the plot summary which was entirely copyvio from IMDb, so obviously there's still a lot of work to do in order to get this to an even passable-quality article, but WP:ARTN says that the current poor quality of the article does not detract from the subject's notability. — Toughpigs (talk) 18:59, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as reliable book sources have been identified and added to the article so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is no longer necessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.