Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HydraIRC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. consensus seems to be that there are not enough significant mentions in reliable, secondary sources to establish notability. NW ( Talk ) 22:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

HydraIRC

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete. And another non-notable software application which fails GNG. This article is apparently edited by the authors of the software (COI?) not that that has any real impact on the general notability here. JBsupreme ( talk ) 22:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:21, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 02:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. A blurb in a book, included in a round-up in Russian here, two-paragraph review in netzwelt, and mentioned as "feature-packed" in The Hindu (mainstream newspaper). Pcap ping  18:49, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - this article appears non notable. 2 or 3 trivial mentions do not establish notability. Theserialcomma (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per Pcap. LotLE × talk  23:02, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I trust Joe's search for sources. I also trust Pcap, but I disagree with him that a smattering of trivial mentions amounts to notability. Miami33139 (talk) 02:22, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.