Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydration for Health Initiative


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 05:34, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Hydration for Health Initiative

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This is a promotional website for Danone. All the references in the article support claims unrelated to the organisation itself - that is, they support claims which could readily be merged to dehydration or other articles. There are no mentions of this initiative in Google News, and I can't find any reliable sources discussing this topic in scholarly works, journals, or books. Most hits on search engines are related to the site itself, Danone-related sites, or sites marketing it. Mind matrix  13:44, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The sourcing in the article consist of a primary source (the initiative's web site), and a bunch of sources confirming general information about hydration versus information about the web site. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete nothing in gnews, gbooks nor gscholar. LibStar (talk) 07:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - This is nothing more than commercial product promotion for Danone disguised as an encylopedic article; no mention in reliable sources such as academic or trade journals,--Hokeman (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.