Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydraulix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  18:39, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Hydraulix

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence this label or it's red-linked owner are notable. For the same reasons I'm including its collective:
 * StarM 16:02, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.   --  StarM  16:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Note lest some see it as removing possibly relevant content, I'm just commenting out (with explanatory comments) of why the "notable artists" aren't -- in most cases they're about something wiht the same name. StarM  16:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: notability not established. JamesBurns (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:MUSIC and is in no way notable.203.192.80.31 (talk) 09:07, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable. No indication of how it meets the notability requirements for the music industry or businesses in general. Nuttah (talk) 11:22, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.