Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HydroGeoSphere


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter123    (articulate)  @ 23:17, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

HydroGeoSphere

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any special notability and none claimed. Lacks any significant sources and appears to be just another modelling tool.  Velella  Velella Talk 19:48, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

HydroGeoSphere is an extremely important numerical model used by the hydrology community. It has a long set of publications http://www.aquanty.com/publication/ and is the current state-of-the-art numerical model. HGS started in 2000 and is still being developed by several research teams. I will add more citations in the upcoming week Jhdavison Jhdavison (talk) 23:54, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 02:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 02:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - It's well known in the research community, well-referenced in academic literature, and used throughout the world. + m t  03:30, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Google book search gives 109 results and Google scholar gives it 757. Are there any textbooks or scientific publications on university websites(other than those that created it) that mention it?   D r e a m Focus  06:47, 2 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Here are some articles:
 * Also there are additional citations to FRAC3DVS, which is the same software before being renamed (and oddly not mentioned in the article). + m t  00:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Also there are additional citations to FRAC3DVS, which is the same software before being renamed (and oddly not mentioned in the article). + m t  00:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Also there are additional citations to FRAC3DVS, which is the same software before being renamed (and oddly not mentioned in the article). + m t  00:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)




 * Keep - Clear consensus and evidence of notability. Why was this relisted? ~KvnG 22:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.