Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogel agriculture


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  03:19, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Hydrogel agriculture

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This reads as WP:OR to me. Most of it is based on (now removed) predatory journals and the like Guy (Help!) 21:55, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - a wall of text about fringey pseudoscience with lousy sourcing. Bearian (talk) 03:38, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. StevenDaniels (talk) 09:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Kindly Consider Similar to what I have mentioned in the talk page, being a new user, I have tried to do keep a neutral point of view while writing. The cited sources have been thoroughly studied before citing and the user welcomes correction and information from more relevant sources. I am trying to upgrade the content quality as well and request the article be not deleted but considered for correction/re-evaluationStevenDaniels (talk) 10:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:00, 29 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 11:29, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - it was indeed a bit of a mess. I've removed the uncited material, rewritten the lead, and added five reliable sources including a review paper. I think the Times of India report also reputable: I've rewritten that paragraph and formatted the citation properly. As for the science, there is no doubt that hydrogels do absorb a lot of water, and would indeed improve the properties of soil in dry places. Hydrogels can, too, be made of many different materials, anything that forms a 3-D network of long chain molecules and is reasonably insoluble and non-toxic will work. It's a notable topic and I'm happy to recommend keeping the article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep because of the significant improvements to the article. Wow, kudos to ! Bearian (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.