Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Research by Biswajit mandal,Department of Chemical, Engg, Haldia Institute of Technology,West Bengal,India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 04:26, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Hydrogen Energy and Fuel Cell Research by Biswajit mandal,Department of Chemical, Engg, Haldia Institute of Technology,West Bengal,India

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The page is an WP:OR violation, written by the subject of the article, in an essay-like tone. A few shreds of information might be include-able into extant articles on fuel cells, though I doubt it. Agamemnon2 08:25, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research. BTLizard 08:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 09:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Main author of article is Biswajit Mandal himself. Wikipedia is not a file storage site. Also, he has uploaded several images relating to himself and his article. --Lmblackjack21 10:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Obvious speedy delete. --Itub 12:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Violating WP:OR is not a speedy deletio criteria though. Nor is obscene long titles in articles, though it should be. Mind you, I did nominate another similar submission of his with speedy earlier, but that was procedurally incorrect since it didn't fulfill any of WP:CSD--Agamemnon2 15:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It meets the criteria of db-spam IMO. --Itub 18:22, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment The article has some WP:COI problems, but there does appear to be a core of useful and important info in it which has been published in sources whose "reliability" I am not able to judge. Perhaps if it gets deleted the article creator could add the info (with references) to appropriate articles on biomass and fuel cells. Edison 16:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Absolutely, since he is evidently an expert in the field, I'm sure there are articles that would benefit from his experience. --Agamemnon2 17:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Inform the contributor of how article and content-generation on Wikipedia work. If he so desires, perhaps this could be sent to Wikisource or somewhere, but even that I'm not sure about. Then Delete these pages.   FrozenPurpleCube 21:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per nom. Chris 02:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This theory hasn't been talked about widely around the world by journalists and such. It's original research. Also, it is written in an unencyclopedic tone, as if it's copied directly from some paper.--Kylohk 16:07, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research and/or possibly a copyvio. *Cremepuff  222*  21:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.