Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydromap


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 07:49, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hydromap


Original research (written in the first person, no less). Formerly prodded with the same reason and deleted, then reposted. --  Merope  14:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Very very obvious original research, and proud of it!  Someone needs to have a serious chat with the author (preferable someone who speaks German to minimize possible confusion).  Xtifr tälk 17:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR but so bad it could be speediable as spam. -- RHaworth 18:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom
 * Delete This is a dissertation Perhaps not quite spam; the editor may be unaware of his transgression. but obvious WP:OR. Talk to the editor, please.--Anthony.bradbury 23:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Wikipedia articles are never written in the first person. B.Wind 00:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect, patent nonsense. — CharlotteWebb 10:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not a dog 04:30, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.