Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hylan's "emergency bus lines"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to History_of_New_York_City_transportation. Though not sure how to organize the below content so I will let the parties decided what to put there. JForget 13:34, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Hylan's "emergency bus lines"

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Not notable. In the creation edit summary, the author stated that the article was started solely for taking notes on the talk page. Also, the title's use of quotes violates WP:AT. Train2104 (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  13:32, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to History_of_New_York_City_transportation. It isn't mentioned at all in the article on NYC transportation, but it definitely isn't notable enough or have enough content for its own article. --Slon02 (talk) 21:26, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to History_of_New_York_City_transportation per Slon02, although I would like to point out that there's more detail on the talk page of that article than in the article itself. This should be part of the content of this chapter once the article is merged. DanTD (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. What an idiotic list, dragging down the appearance of Wikipedia. All that is needed is a note of this happening in History of New York City transportation. Nageh (talk) 09:46, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge but do  not keep- I cannot see what  use this iist  is as a stand-alone.--Kudpung (talk) 13:29, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.