Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyona Park


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:02, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Hyona Park

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The cited source does not provide evidence of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines, and her greatest significance seems to be once being a runner-up in a not very notable contest. (PROD removed by a single purpose account, without any reason being given.) The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — MRD2014  (talk · contribs) 17:28, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete: Top searches on Google were for social media-related stuff and I couldn't find much on her. — MRD2014 (talk · contribs) 17:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Every beauty pageant that exists at all does not confer an automatic notability freebie on every contestant in it — it takes reliable source coverage about her, not primary sourced verification of her existence, to get her in the door. Bearcat (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no indications of notability; the event itself is not particularly notable. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:03, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete We lack any articles on the winners of the international titles. No evidence that winners of this title at the national level are notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.