Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyper super dyslexia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. No ghits except mirrors of us. Consensus seems clear, funny comments or no. -- + +Lar: t/c 04:12, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Hyper super dyslexia
Dyslexia makes no mention of this variant and a quick search on the internet also turns up nothing. I think that this is not a recognised variant and hence is not worthy of an encyclopaedia article RicDod 19:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per what RicDod said. also blatantly stupid W guice 21:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete reads like patent nonsense. Danny Lilithborne 00:12, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment When I saw this article on Wikipedia I thought I had come down with some form of Hyper Super Dyslexia


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.