Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypnoskull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Hypnoskull

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Lots of AllMusic listings but no reviews in a basic music RS search. Only hits in Google Books were mentions, nothing in-depth. Perhaps there's coverage in non-English sources? There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. – czar   16:23, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 01:35, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete without prejudice as it stands - it really needs anything at all in the way of (third-party, verifiable) references - David Gerard (talk) 00:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably delete for now - I can't translate any of this but my searches regardless found nothing better aside from this and this. SwisterTwister   talk  05:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ... yeah, it's a bit skimpy. That said, the coverage there is (book mentions, etc.) strongly suggests there should be usable RSes ... but where are they? - David Gerard (talk) 10:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: some print sources here. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 02:21, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't see anything more than passing mentions at that link, so I'm not sure why you posted it. – czar   22:45, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  06:18, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Beyond the fact that there doesn't seem to be anything beyond passing mentions or listings, and although it seems like a band this old would have some coverage, the page has had fewer than fifty edits in ten years, and only 500 views in the last three months. I don't think the article will be missed, but I agree with David Gerard above that this should be without prejudice against recreation, if anyone cares enough to try later on. —Torchiest talkedits 13:57, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.