Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'lam foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

I'lam foundation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Other than the one source from the militantwire.com, which is an unreliable source, zero in-depth coverage to show notability. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 17:04, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Terrorism.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:13, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 22:36, 14 January 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:19, 22 January 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * That's incorrect, there's other sources including MEMRI, Eurasia, The Diplomat, and The Jamestown Foundation, which most are very reliable, and most, but not all go in depth, so it does pass GNG and ORGDEPTH. RowanJ LP (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.