Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Never Forget what You Did Last Summer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete – Gurch 15:02, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

I'll Never Forget what You Did Last Summer

 * Delete. Per Fan1967's comment in AfD for Signs 2, suspect editor appears to be creating nonsense sequel articles. &mdash; WCityMike (talk &bull; contribs) 19:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Important clerical notice I just wanted to note for the record on this vote that this article creator is creating multiple sequel articles with no references whatsoever &mdash; examples are Signs 2, Blair Witch 3: The Prequel, Speed 3, Stir of Echoes: The Dead Speak, and I'll Never Forget what You Did Last Summer, possibly for sinister reasons (see Fan1967's statement in Articles for deletion/Signs 2) Furthermore, same creator is continually removing the AfD notices on his pages, so you may want to keep a special eye on the source page for this article to make sure that they don't do the same with yours.  Blocking may be slightly ineffective due to the anonymous editors being behind AOL proxy servers (see here and here). &mdash; Mike &bull;  02:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow-up: Third edit after the 24-hour block expired was to wipe it again, and subsequently got blocked again, this time for 48 hours. &mdash; Mike  &bull;  23:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow-up: First edit after the 48-hour block expired was to wipe it again, and subsequently got blocked again, this time for 1 week. User, BTW, is confirmed as Afi0956. &mdash; Mike &bull; 23:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. PJM 19:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources, no verification, and ridiculous shooting schedule. Fan1967 19:54, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As a filmmaker I can say it's nearly impossible to make a movie (around 2 hours) from spring to summer, especially under Hollywood standards. Yanksox 22:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax &mdash;M e ts501 talk 23:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete burninate this garbage. Danny Lilithborne 23:20, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. Nertz 00:25, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Otherwise Dreamworks seems to be taking the Shrek films in an odd new direction. Voice of Treason 14:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and burninate. Track down the author and staple his knees together. ---Charles 03:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Is that possible? Yanksox 03:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You need really big staples. Fan1967 15:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * It's worth the effort. --Charles 20:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOT crystalball clause.--Isotope23 19:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as with the other film sequel articles, these are unjustified crystal ball cruft with no value or worth. doktorb | words 09:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Aggressive mass crystalballism. Kevin_b_er 08:28, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.