Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Result was Delete. -- VS talk 05:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm Game

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism, I've heard the phrase, but this article is basically just a story. J- ſtan ContribsUser page 03:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Somehow I suspect that the article creator User:Lawtonkid04 corresponds with K.M.L. in the article-story-thing, while A.E.V. is probably some associate who, apparently, is not as game as K.M.L. -- Nick  Penguin ( contribs ) 04:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Surely there must be reason to speedy delete that nonsense. --Mud4t (talk) 06:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 09:01, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm game is worth a dicdef at best. This nonsense (and it is nonsense, since I have used the phrase for much longer than either of these) must go. Emeraude (talk) 16:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly written, unsourced, and apparently incorrect  Carlyle 3 Carlyle3Contributions/Carlyle 3 
 * How so? Do we have a reliable source saying A.E.V is more game then K.M.L? :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by J-stan (talk • contribs) 17:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Possibly Speedy as G1. Malinaccier (talk) 23:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * speedy delete as patent nonsense  Sudoku424 (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as patent nonsense. At best. Greswik (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
 * SSS delete - that stands for strong, speedy, and snowball delete all in one. I just made that acronym up on the spot (although I have used the term "strong, speedy and snowball delete" before) but it's useful this kind of thing that obviously doesn't belong in the encyclopedia for any reason whatsoever (strong delete) yet doesn't quite meet any of the speedy deletion criteria, but almost does, (so we may as well apply WP:SNOW). The text here is almost totally incoherent, so a G1 nonsense tag is going on the page.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 04:42, 5 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.