Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'm Happy to be Fat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep; editors can improve and/ or merge through continued discussion elsewhere.  Jerry  talk ¤ count/logs 20:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I'm Happy to be Fat

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

There are about 140 episodes of the show True Life shown on MTV, which started in 1998. They're all listed on the show's page - not very pretty, but still listed. Yet there's only four episodes (three from which are the new season) that have pages about them. The main one I've listed has almost nothing in the article; the other four have good summaries but don't need pages in my opinion as about 135 pages of equal value do not. If the episodes do have pages, I say it be something like List of Supernatural episodes where each episode has a tiny summary but not a whole page where it's just a small article and wasting space. Plus there were no real references on the pages. EDIT: Only one to have references is the one that is two sentences long; the other three have none or have external links.

I also am nominating for the same reasoning:


 * I Don't Fit In
 * I'm Dead Broke
 * I'm Looking for my Father


 * Comment No real references? There are four references on I'm Happy to be Fat. Two of them are city newspapers. How is that not a real reference? Morhange (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The only page to have references is the one that has two sentences. Sorry, should've made that clear. I just find it ridiculous that an article has more references than sentences. -Babylon pride (talk) 22:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Would make sense to divide these up by seasons, not delete them. We need some way of discussing these is a more rational fashion than proposing them for deletion one at a time. DGG (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Happy to be fat: very well sourced for a stub. no clue on the other three. Agree with DGG that a season-based approach is the right one here, but that's not for AfD. Hobit (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge into True Life so that the sourced sentence can live on. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  16:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.